Thank you, looks good: I approve. On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 10:16 PM Sandy Ginoza <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Jake, Bas, and Sean, > > We have updated the document and posted the revised files here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.xml > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.html > > Diffs highlighting only the recent changes: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastdiff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastrfcdiff.html (side by > side) > > AUTH48 diffs: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by > side) > > Comprehensive diffs: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > > Bas - regarding the following, the lines in RFC 5912 are already outdented > (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5912.txt, p17). The lines in RFC > 5912 are actually outdented 3 additional spaces; we are unable to make them > match with our current tools. > > >> Note that instead of breaking the line, we outdented — please let us > know if you prefer otherwise. > > > > Outdenting looks good to me, I'm assuming both "Current" and "From > [RFC5912]" will be outdented to match eachother. > > > Please review and let us know if any further updates are needed or if you > approve the RFC for publication. > > Thanks, > Sandy Ginoza > RFC Production Center > > > > > On Oct 10, 2025, at 6:01 AM, Bas Westerbaan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yes, good catch. > > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just want to make sure I didn’t introduce an error, but wanted more eyes: > > > > Appendix D includes this: > > > > # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash(pk, M, ctx)' > > # in the FIPS 204 FAQ. > > > > and this: > > > > # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Sign(sk, μ)' > > # in the FIPS 204 FAQ. > > > > Do we need to change these μ to Mu because that’s how the are actually > referenced in the FIPS FAQ? > > > > spt > > > > > >> On Oct 10, 2025, at 06:03, Bas Westerbaan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Sandy, > >> > >> Thank you for the quick updates. > >> > >> I see some changes are still required. > >> > >> - Section 2. Regarding changes for your origin point 1: you added an > ampersand in front of "Params", but not in front of "id" on the line before > that. > >> > >> - References. Regarding changes for your original point 7: you haven't > updated the URL of the reference CDFFJ21 to the specific version correctly. > It should be https://eprint.iacr.org/archive/2020/1525/20231023:114351 > >> > >> Otherwise it looks great, thanks! > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Bas > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 4:50 AM Massimo, Jake <jakemas= > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Sandy, Bas, > >> > >> I can check a few confirmations off of this list: > >> > >> > Note that instead of breaking the line, we outdented — please let us > know if you prefer otherwise. > >> > >> Outdenting looks good to me, I'm assuming both "Current" and "From > [RFC5912]" will be outdented to match eachother. > >> > >> > We updated to use “pre-hash” except in the following: > >> > # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash(pk, M, ctx)' > >> > Please let us know if any updates are needed. > >> > >> Confirming this is ok, and that we would not want to change > 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash'. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Jake > >> > > > >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
