Hi Bas and Panos, Thank you for your reviews. We have noted your approvals on the AUTH48 page <https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9881>. Once we have received approvals from you coauthors, we will continue with the publication process.
Thank you, Sandy Ginoza RFC Production Center > On Oct 11, 2025, at 8:39 PM, Kampanakis, Panos <[email protected]> wrote: > > Approved > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sandy Ginoza <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2025 4:16 PM > To: Bas Westerbaan <[email protected]> > Cc: Sean Turner <[email protected]>; Massimo, Jake > <[email protected]>; Kampanakis, Panos <[email protected]>; > RFC Editor <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Russ Housley <[email protected]>; Deb Cooley > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9881 > <draft-ietf-lamps-dilithium-certificates-13> for your review > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the > content is safe. > > > > Hi Jake, Bas, and Sean, > > We have updated the document and posted the revised files here: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.xml > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.txt > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.pdf > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.html > > Diffs highlighting only the recent changes: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastdiff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) > > AUTH48 diffs: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > Comprehensive diffs: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-diff.html > https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-rfcdiff.html (side by side) > > > Bas - regarding the following, the lines in RFC 5912 are already outdented > (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5912.txt, p17). The lines in RFC 5912 > are actually outdented 3 additional spaces; we are unable to make them match > with our current tools. > >>> Note that instead of breaking the line, we outdented — please let us know >>> if you prefer otherwise. >> >> Outdenting looks good to me, I'm assuming both "Current" and "From >> [RFC5912]" will be outdented to match eachother. > > > Please review and let us know if any further updates are needed or if you > approve the RFC for publication. > > Thanks, > Sandy Ginoza > RFC Production Center > > > >> On Oct 10, 2025, at 6:01 AM, Bas Westerbaan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yes, good catch. >> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just want to make sure I didn’t introduce an error, but wanted more eyes: >> >> Appendix D includes this: >> >> # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash(pk, M, ctx)' >> # in the FIPS 204 FAQ. >> >> and this: >> >> # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Sign(sk, μ)' >> # in the FIPS 204 FAQ. >> >> Do we need to change these μ to Mu because that’s how the are actually >> referenced in the FIPS FAQ? >> >> spt >> >> >>> On Oct 10, 2025, at 06:03, Bas Westerbaan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Sandy, >>> >>> Thank you for the quick updates. >>> >>> I see some changes are still required. >>> >>> - Section 2. Regarding changes for your origin point 1: you added an >>> ampersand in front of "Params", but not in front of "id" on the line before >>> that. >>> >>> - References. Regarding changes for your original point 7: you haven't >>> updated the URL of the reference CDFFJ21 to the specific version correctly. >>> It should be https://eprint.iacr.org/archive/2020/1525/20231023:114351 >>> >>> Otherwise it looks great, thanks! >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Bas >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 4:50 AM Massimo, Jake >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hey Sandy, Bas, >>> >>> I can check a few confirmations off of this list: >>> >>>> Note that instead of breaking the line, we outdented — please let us know >>>> if you prefer otherwise. >>> >>> Outdenting looks good to me, I'm assuming both "Current" and "From >>> [RFC5912]" will be outdented to match eachother. >>> >>>> We updated to use “pre-hash” except in the following: >>>> # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash(pk, M, ctx)' >>>> Please let us know if any updates are needed. >>> >>> Confirming this is ok, and that we would not want to change >>> 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash'. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jake >>> >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
