Hi Jake, Bas, and Sean, We have updated the document and posted the revised files here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881.html
Diffs highlighting only the recent changes: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-lastrfcdiff.html (side by side) AUTH48 diffs: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) Comprehensive diffs: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9881-rfcdiff.html (side by side) Bas - regarding the following, the lines in RFC 5912 are already outdented (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5912.txt, p17). The lines in RFC 5912 are actually outdented 3 additional spaces; we are unable to make them match with our current tools. >> Note that instead of breaking the line, we outdented — please let us know if >> you prefer otherwise. > > Outdenting looks good to me, I'm assuming both "Current" and "From [RFC5912]" > will be outdented to match eachother. Please review and let us know if any further updates are needed or if you approve the RFC for publication. Thanks, Sandy Ginoza RFC Production Center > On Oct 10, 2025, at 6:01 AM, Bas Westerbaan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, good catch. > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 2:57 PM Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > Just want to make sure I didn’t introduce an error, but wanted more eyes: > > Appendix D includes this: > > # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash(pk, M, ctx)' > # in the FIPS 204 FAQ. > > and this: > > # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Sign(sk, μ)' > # in the FIPS 204 FAQ. > > Do we need to change these μ to Mu because that’s how the are actually > referenced in the FIPS FAQ? > > spt > > >> On Oct 10, 2025, at 06:03, Bas Westerbaan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Sandy, >> >> Thank you for the quick updates. >> >> I see some changes are still required. >> >> - Section 2. Regarding changes for your origin point 1: you added an >> ampersand in front of "Params", but not in front of "id" on the line before >> that. >> >> - References. Regarding changes for your original point 7: you haven't >> updated the URL of the reference CDFFJ21 to the specific version correctly. >> It should be https://eprint.iacr.org/archive/2020/1525/20231023:114351 >> >> Otherwise it looks great, thanks! >> >> Best, >> >> Bas >> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 4:50 AM Massimo, Jake >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey Sandy, Bas, >> >> I can check a few confirmations off of this list: >> >> > Note that instead of breaking the line, we outdented — please let us know >> > if you prefer otherwise. >> >> Outdenting looks good to me, I'm assuming both "Current" and "From >> [RFC5912]" will be outdented to match eachother. >> >> > We updated to use “pre-hash” except in the following: >> > # Referred to as 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash(pk, M, ctx)' >> > Please let us know if any updates are needed. >> >> Confirming this is ok, and that we would not want to change >> 'Externalμ-ML-DSA.Prehash'. >> >> Cheers, >> Jake >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
