Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [about making it possible to set PACKAGE] > We could add it, but it doesn't seem that useful in general. It'd be nice to be able to name ``libmyfancylib'' as ``libmyfancylibdbg'' depending on a --disable-debug option to configue, for instance, to make it possible to dual-install a debug version and a regular version of the same library. This seems to be a common thing to do in the MSWin-world, where debug-versions of DLLs are often installed with a "d" as a postfix to the "real" name. Morten
- Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configur... Tom Tromey
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at conf... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at ... Tom Tromey
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Changing the name of the PA... Tom Tromey
- Re: Changing the name of th... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Changing the name of th... Morten Eriksen
- Re: Changing the name of the PA... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Changing the name of th... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configur... Masterson, David
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at conf... Harlan Stenn
- RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configur... Masterson, David
- RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at conf... Tom Tromey
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at ... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE... Tom Tromey
- Re: Changing the name of the PA... Morten Eriksen
- Re: Changing the name of the PA... Russ Allbery