>>>>> "JMarc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JMarc> Well, at my site we have gcc-2.8.1 _and_ gcc-2.95.2, JMarc> emacs-19.34 _and_ emacs-20.2, etc. I thought this was a kind of JMarc> feature of some GNU tools. Is this way of fdoing things JMarc> deprecated? A different --prefix is not very firendly to the JMarc> users, since they will need to add yet another directory to JMarc> their path... If you look you'll find that gcc and emacs are basically the only GNU tools that do this. This feature isn't specified by the GNU standards, and wasn't in wide use as I wrote automake. So there didn't seem to be much reason to add it. We could add it, but it doesn't seem that useful in general. Plus, you can work around it in Makefile.am. OTOH, if somebody sent a clean patch to implement it I might check it in. Tom
- Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configure time Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configur... Tom Tromey
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at conf... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at ... Tom Tromey
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Changing the name of the PA... Tom Tromey
- Re: Changing the name of th... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: Changing the name of th... Morten Eriksen
- Re: Changing the name of the PA... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Changing the name of th... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configur... Masterson, David
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at conf... Harlan Stenn
- RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at configur... Masterson, David
- RE: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at conf... Tom Tromey
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE at ... Paul D. Smith
- Re: Changing the name of the PACKAGE... Tom Tromey