Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> At 12:20 21/4/01 +0200, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> >> I would say stability in general hasn't been it's strong
> >> point ... lumping a whole bunch of junk into one jar
> >> (including stuff that is volatile - see excalibur) is not
> >> a way to achieve stability ;)
> >
> >Reality check ...!!
> >
> > 1. we are not talking about "junk"
>
> Some of it is (and I can say that because I wrote it) ;)
Then document this explicity. Detail what is good, what is bad, what
should be removed, etc.
> > 2. we are talking about a codebase that has not been sufficiently
> > tested to call beta
>
> > 3. separation of this code base is not intended to achieve stability
>
> Thats my main in making it a separate CVS.
>
> > 4. separation of the code base will enable better manageability of
> > of volatile content
>
> right ... so are you agreeing or disagreeing that there should be a
> separate CVS ?
Now Pete, you and I both know that you don't need a new CVS for this!
Furthermore - the question is no longer on the agenda :-)
Cheers, Steve.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
