Dear Henri,
>
>
> Kinda links with a question I've been pondering asking to the Commons
> group. I want to have a C# version of Commons Lang, but am unsure how to
> go about managing it at the moment.
>
As concerning to jakarta-commons-lang:
I have to upset you, C# has already had all these features.
I no wonder, cause Microsoft made the greit job of gathering
feature-requests and
the analysis of all exist languages and technologies.
By the way, .NET/C# has already had the features of almost all products from
jakarta-commons.
For example, jakarta-commons-lang, jakarta-commons-httpclient,
jakarta-commons-jxpath and so on ...
So making an implementation of them has no sense.
It seems to me, Microsoft made Jakarta product analysis as well.
> Anyways, Yauheny, would you be interested in having reusable C# libraries
> from Commons/somewhere in the same way Avalon is moving to reusing Commons
> components? [or donating Avalon components to Commons]...
>
Now I'm working at Avalon Framework and Excalibur.
There are a lot work to do (Merlin, Fortress and so on...).
Best Regards,
Yauheny Mikulski.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Avalon Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:13 PM
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] .NET implementation of Avalon framework.
>
>
> Kinda links with a question I've been pondering asking to the Commons
> group. I want to have a C# version of Commons Lang, but am unsure how to
> go about managing it at the moment.
>
> Anyways, Yauheny, would you be interested in having reusable C# libraries
> from Commons/somewhere in the same way Avalon is moving to reusing Commons
> components? [or donating Avalon components to Commons]...
>
> Just an idea,
>
> Hen
>
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
> > > From: Yauheny Mikulski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'd like to introduce a .NET implementation of the Avalon
> > > framework ideas. I'm sure that such implementations of Avalon
> > > can give people the opportunities
> > > to use its ideas in other languages (in this case .NET).
> > > It is available at http://www.ymikulski.narod.ru/Avalon-src.zip
> >
> >
> > Yauheny has contacted Peter D. and I offline, to see what we
> > think of it already.
> >
> > His submission is basically a port of Avalon Framework to .NET(C#).
> > I must confess my ignorance of .NET and C# and the lack of a compiler,
> > so I can't comment on the quality of the code. He has answered
> > my questions, so before we start jumping on the style of the code,
> > we have to remember that C# is a microsoft engineered product
> > and the style is forced on the end developer (i.e. if you want to use
> > their code documentor or use it within .NET).
> >
> >
> > > So I'd like to join you and go on working as .NET(C#) Avalon
> > > developer
> > > and I would also like to see my work on Jakarta Avalon site.
> >
> > I personally would be +1 on this. It is better to have Avalon get
> > in early with the C#/.NET framework to create a foundation that
> > many more people will use.
> >
> > I only ask that that you write the docs to support the C# specifics,
> > referring to the ones for Java since they are basically referring
> > to the same thing.
> >
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Yauheny Mikulski.
> > >
> > > P.S.
> > > You should take into that C# language has its own particular
> > > features and requirements. All source code has been written
> > > under these ones. But, of course, I kept all Avalon's
> > > features and foundations. It was my primary goal.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
