> I don't think anyone wants to use MS JDK 1.1.4 for real... <rant> I know. Just joking around, but seriously, weapons of choice are less important than design to me. PERSONALLY, I am not compelled to switch (not yet anyways). I've learned the technology, and will sit back and watch it mature. I like these efforts that bring good practice and provide tools that Java developers have grown to love and depend on to .NET. Keep em' up :-) </rant>
Mike > > >>Question: Is it appropriate for Jakarta? >> >>Personally I'd like to see Jakarta stay a Java Community, but >>hey, since >>C# could have just as easily been named Java Jr., why not. >> >>Mike >> >>Ilia Iourovitski wrote: >> >>>Well Mono is coming. On their mailing list I've seen >> >>discussions about >> >>>enterprise services. >>> >> >>http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-list/2002-July/000938.htm >> >>>l >>> >>>Another advantage to have C# Avalon is integration >>>with >>>Win32 API. >>> >>>Imagine Phoenix using MSMQ, MTS. Or Avalon as ECMA >>>standard for .NET Enterprise Services :) >>> >>>Ilia >>> >>> >>>--- Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>From: Yauheny Mikulski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>>> >>>>>Hello, >>>>> >>>>>I'd like to introduce a .NET implementation of the >>>> >>>>Avalon >>>> >>>> >>>>>framework ideas. I'm sure that such >>>> >>>>implementations of Avalon >>>> >>>> >>>>>can give people the opportunities >>>>>to use its ideas in other languages (in this case >>>> >>>>.NET). >>>> >>>> >>>>>It is available at >>>> >>>>http://www.ymikulski.narod.ru/Avalon-src.zip >>>> >>>> >>>>Yauheny has contacted Peter D. and I offline, to see >>>>what we >>>>think of it already. >>>> >>>>His submission is basically a port of Avalon >>>>Framework to .NET(C#). >>>>I must confess my ignorance of .NET and C# and the >>>>lack of a compiler, >>>>so I can't comment on the quality of the code. He >>>>has answered >>>>my questions, so before we start jumping on the >>>>style of the code, >>>>we have to remember that C# is a microsoft >>>>engineered product >>>>and the style is forced on the end developer (i.e. >>>>if you want to use >>>>their code documentor or use it within .NET). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>So I'd like to join you and go on working as >>>> >>>>.NET(C#) Avalon >>>> >>>> >>>>>developer >>>>>and I would also like to see my work on Jakarta >>>> >>>>Avalon site. >>>> >>>>I personally would be +1 on this. It is better to >>>>have Avalon get >>>>in early with the C#/.NET framework to create a >>>>foundation that >>>>many more people will use. >>>> >>>>I only ask that that you write the docs to support >>>>the C# specifics, >>>>referring to the ones for Java since they are >>>>basically referring >>>>to the same thing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Best Regards, >>>>> Yauheny Mikulski. >>>>> >>>>>P.S. >>>>>You should take into that C# language has its own >>>> >>>>particular >>>> >>>> >>>>>features and requirements. All source code has >>>> >>>>been written >>>> >>>> >>>>>under these ones. But, of course, I kept all >>>> >>>>Avalon's >>>> >>>> >>>>>features and foundations. It was my primary goal. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: >>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> >>>__________________________________________________ >>>Do You Yahoo!? >>>Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> >><mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>For >> >>additional commands, >>e-mail: >> >>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >> >>-- >><Mike/> >> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For >>additional commands, >>e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- <Mike/> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
