For a technology that was marketed as language independent, it's sure interesting to see this trend of re-writing code. :-)
Question: Is it appropriate for Jakarta? Personally I'd like to see Jakarta stay a Java Community, but hey, since C# could have just as easily been named Java Jr., why not. Mike Ilia Iourovitski wrote: > Well Mono is coming. On their mailing list I've seen > discussions about enterprise services. > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-list/2002-July/000938.html > > Another advantage to have C# Avalon is integration > with > Win32 API. > > Imagine Phoenix using MSMQ, MTS. Or Avalon as ECMA > standard for .NET Enterprise Services :) > > Ilia > > > --- Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>From: Yauheny Mikulski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>I'd like to introduce a .NET implementation of the >> >>Avalon >> >>>framework ideas. I'm sure that such >> >>implementations of Avalon >> >>>can give people the opportunities >>>to use its ideas in other languages (in this case >> >>.NET). >> >>>It is available at >> >>http://www.ymikulski.narod.ru/Avalon-src.zip >> >> >>Yauheny has contacted Peter D. and I offline, to see >>what we >>think of it already. >> >>His submission is basically a port of Avalon >>Framework to .NET(C#). >>I must confess my ignorance of .NET and C# and the >>lack of a compiler, >>so I can't comment on the quality of the code. He >>has answered >>my questions, so before we start jumping on the >>style of the code, >>we have to remember that C# is a microsoft >>engineered product >>and the style is forced on the end developer (i.e. >>if you want to use >>their code documentor or use it within .NET). >> >> >> >>>So I'd like to join you and go on working as >> >>.NET(C#) Avalon >> >>>developer >>>and I would also like to see my work on Jakarta >> >>Avalon site. >> >>I personally would be +1 on this. It is better to >>have Avalon get >>in early with the C#/.NET framework to create a >>foundation that >>many more people will use. >> >>I only ask that that you write the docs to support >>the C# specifics, >>referring to the ones for Java since they are >>basically referring >>to the same thing. >> >> >>>Best Regards, >>> Yauheny Mikulski. >>> >>>P.S. >>>You should take into that C# language has its own >> >>particular >> >>>features and requirements. All source code has >> >>been written >> >>>under these ones. But, of course, I kept all >> >>Avalon's >> >>>features and foundations. It was my primary goal. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>For additional commands, e-mail: >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better > http://health.yahoo.com > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- <Mike/> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
