> From: Michael Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > For a technology that was marketed as language independent, it's sure > interesting to see this trend of re-writing code. :-)
I don't think anyone wants to use MS JDK 1.1.4 for real... > > Question: Is it appropriate for Jakarta? > > Personally I'd like to see Jakarta stay a Java Community, but > hey, since > C# could have just as easily been named Java Jr., why not. > > Mike > > Ilia Iourovitski wrote: > > Well Mono is coming. On their mailing list I've seen > discussions about > > enterprise services. > > > http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-list/2002-July/000938.htm > > l > > > > Another advantage to have C# Avalon is integration > > with > > Win32 API. > > > > Imagine Phoenix using MSMQ, MTS. Or Avalon as ECMA > > standard for .NET Enterprise Services :) > > > > Ilia > > > > > > --- Berin Loritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>>From: Yauheny Mikulski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > >>>Hello, > >>> > >>>I'd like to introduce a .NET implementation of the > >> > >>Avalon > >> > >>>framework ideas. I'm sure that such > >> > >>implementations of Avalon > >> > >>>can give people the opportunities > >>>to use its ideas in other languages (in this case > >> > >>.NET). > >> > >>>It is available at > >> > >>http://www.ymikulski.narod.ru/Avalon-src.zip > >> > >> > >>Yauheny has contacted Peter D. and I offline, to see > >>what we > >>think of it already. > >> > >>His submission is basically a port of Avalon > >>Framework to .NET(C#). > >>I must confess my ignorance of .NET and C# and the > >>lack of a compiler, > >>so I can't comment on the quality of the code. He > >>has answered > >>my questions, so before we start jumping on the > >>style of the code, > >>we have to remember that C# is a microsoft > >>engineered product > >>and the style is forced on the end developer (i.e. > >>if you want to use > >>their code documentor or use it within .NET). > >> > >> > >> > >>>So I'd like to join you and go on working as > >> > >>.NET(C#) Avalon > >> > >>>developer > >>>and I would also like to see my work on Jakarta > >> > >>Avalon site. > >> > >>I personally would be +1 on this. It is better to > >>have Avalon get > >>in early with the C#/.NET framework to create a > >>foundation that > >>many more people will use. > >> > >>I only ask that that you write the docs to support > >>the C# specifics, > >>referring to the ones for Java since they are > >>basically referring > >>to the same thing. > >> > >> > >>>Best Regards, > >>> Yauheny Mikulski. > >>> > >>>P.S. > >>>You should take into that C# language has its own > >> > >>particular > >> > >>>features and requirements. All source code has > >> > >>been written > >> > >>>under these ones. But, of course, I kept all > >> > >>Avalon's > >> > >>>features and foundations. It was my primary goal. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>For additional commands, e-mail: > >><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better http://health.yahoo.com > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For > additional commands, > e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > -- > <Mike/> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:avalon-dev-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For > additional commands, > e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
