Leo Simons wrote:
I agree.On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 08:48, Stephen McConnell wrote:Maybe it would be a good idea to include in this document some links to some of the other Avalon containers. The current content suggests Phoenix as a starting point which is a little like learning to swim at the deep end of the pool. It could be interesting to reference Tweety and the entry point, followed by Merlin and Fortress dealing with cause grained components, and wrapping up Phoenix at the application level.
Thoughts?
I don't really like it. I feel our documentation should point to released and easily downloadable software; atm, the only containers with that status are phoenix and ECM, and I feel it is a good idea to not stimulate usage of ECM. When fortress,tweety etc are released it's a different thing alltogether.
Such important docs should reference only released software.
Tweety will be IMHO the real entry point to new Avalon users, but it still has to be released.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
