On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 10:18, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > We also should decide where it goes, and some have hinted it could go > side by side with the framework, although not being in the same package. > IMVHO it could be used as a simple reference implementation of the > framework concepts and contracts. > > Continuing the past proposal about a new unified CVS, thinking out loud: > > ./src/framework/**.java > ./src/reference/**.java > ./src/util/**.java > > ./scratchpad/src/merlin2/**.java > ./scratchpad/src/fortress/**.java > > Thoughts?
I think you can view Tweety as a concept implementation, but not as a reference implementation. One thing it doesn't do for example is protect components from each other, or guarantee that the stuff a component can get from its SM has run up to initialize(). There's a lot of stuff like that, and adding it all in would make the code complex to the level where it will be quite a bit more difficult to understand. cheers, - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
