Leo Simons wrote:
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 10:57, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I think you can view Tweety as a concept implementation, but not as a
reference implementation. One thing it doesn't do for example is protect
components from each other, or guarantee that the stuff a component can
get from its SM has run up to initialize().
There's a lot of stuff like that, and adding it all in would make the
code complex to the level where it will be quite a bit more difficult to
understand.
roger
In fact I was thinking of eventually adding other systems
egg-tweety-birdy-pigeon-etc, but yes, it's a concept implementation.
Where would you position it then phisically? I have no clue.
as in where in a potential unified CVS? In scratchpad atm, when it is
finished it (and other stuff, like 'pigeon'), could be put into
something like /src/tutorial/.
+1
Steve.
cheers,
- Leo
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
--
Stephen J. McConnell
OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:mcconnell@;osm.net
http://www.osm.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:avalon-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
