On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 14:01, Stephen McConnell wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > >"layman" version of the text below; I think this is for all practical > >purposes the same but it reads a little easier (the trick: use a > >1000-word vocabulary ;). If it is indeed the same for practical purposes > >(Steve?) then I'm happy with the proposal I think. > > The text (for all practical purposes) is the same as the proposal.
Gotcha! You've fallen into my simplicity trap :D If - it is for all practical purposes the same, - this documentation is not required to have a watertight legal status, - the "layman" form is easier to read and understand, then why not just write the documentation this way and forget about the formal 'look-n-feel'? > This > is exactly the sort of thing I would image on a web page that descibes > the policies and procedures concerning decision making. That same web > page would also provide a link to the formal document. What purpose does the "formal" document then serve? I think no-one 'll be reading it anyway. cheers, - Leo -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
