Thank you! My own jtreg running infrastructure now uses -noreport as the default.
It's a little surprising that report generation is a global operation while test running is "local", although it's understandable because jtreg wants to report all tests NOT run as well. I don't see this explained anywhere in the docs. The 10 second tax for the jdk repo is just small enough that everyone just lives with it, not knowing about -noreport. I'm guessing most people would be happier if -noreport was the default. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jonathan Gibbons < jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com> wrote: > Actually, jtreg is (has always been) optimised to *run* tests efficiently, > with no time tax. > But yes, there is a time tax, which comes from writing the report at the > end of the test run, and that is actually where the clash is (probably) > being detected. > > And, my guess is that a developer running "jtreg MyTest.java" doesn't > need/want/care about the report. If so, there are two ways to disable the > report: > > 1. Options: -noreport (or -nr for short) > 2. System property: javatest.noReportRequired > > -- Jon > > On 11/23/2016 01:19 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > Jonathan: Here's a small jtreg feature request: > It's nice for release engineers to have jtreg check the whole test/ tree > for correct test definitions. But for developers who are just doing > > jtreg MyTest.java > > they're not interested in awt failures, and don't want to pay the > 10-second tax to check every test definition for every jtreg invocation. > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Jonathan Gibbons < > jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/23/2016 12:47 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: >> >>> Am I the only one seeing jtreg test failures in latest jdk9/dev, >>> apparently due to >>> >>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8160766 >>> >>> Error: Test clashes with another test with a similar name: >>> .../jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/DisposedWindow/DisposeDialogNotA >>> ctivateOwnerTest/DisposeDialogNotActivateOwnerTest.java >>> .../jdk/test/java/awt/Focus/DisposedWindow/DisposeDialogNot >>> ActivateOwnerTest/DisposeDialogNotActivateOwnerTest.html >>> >>> (even though I'm not actually running any of the awt tests?) >>> >> >> >> Martin, >> >> It looks like this is a test bug, introduced in this changeset. >> >> changeset: 16112:88faebbdbf9b >> user: arapte >> date: Fri Nov 04 21:55:19 2016 +0530 >> summary: 8160766: [TEST_BUG] java/awt/Focus/DisposedWindow >> >> >> The problem edit looks like this: >> >> >> /* >> - test >> - @bug 6386592 >> - @summary Tests that disposing a dialog doesn't activate its >> invisible owner. >> - @author anton.tara...@sun.com: area=awt.focus >> - @run applet DisposeDialogNotActivateOwnerTest.html >> + @test >> + @key headful >> + @bug 6386592 8160766 >> + @summary Tests that disposing a dialog doesn't activate its invisible >> owner. >> */ >> >> Note that plain "test" was edited to "@test", meaning that the file >> previously was not a standalone jtreg test, and it was changed to be one. >> This causes a clash with an HTML test of the same base name. >> >> jtreg correctly reports the clash, because both tests would lead to the >> same .jtr file. i.e. you can't have two tests that only differ in their >> filename extension. >> >> -- Jon >> > > >
