Thats true, we cannot and should not try to satisfy everybody.
Most people are looking for a magic wand that will create there code with minimum effort as possible.
Reading the thread on TSS I was sad to see that most people have missed the boat about Web Services.
These people expect nothing but to expose their **objects** as Web Services using some framework with minimum effort as possible.
Thats as far as they are willing to go with Web Services.
Regards,
Rajith
On 5/8/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sure.
- Beware of people with hidden agendas. You can never please everyone.
- Once you meet the objective criteria (say "add spring support"), you
will hear either ("it's not easy" or "it's complicated" in other words
"It does not meet my unspecified standards that are in my
head"-kind-of subjective criteria.
thanks,
dims
On 5/8/06, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking at the thread on TSS, it looks like some people are hell bent on
> having spring support.
>
> Paul already has some code (sandbox) attached to the jira AXIS2-272
> I looked at them and it does provide a nice way of exposing spring beans as
> Web Services via a MessageReceiver
>
> I agree with Paul that there is some common code that could be refactored
> out in the message reciver classes.
>
> Shall we work on this code base and provide the support these people are
> asking for??
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
