-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Amila Suriarachchi wrote:

> 
> I have misunderstood the thing.
> you mean
> 1. minimal distribution with
>        server,client and kernal
> 2. full distribution with
>        minmal + optional
> 3. Tools distribution with
>        tools

Exactly yes. I am not sure whether we need to expand full distro also in
to two. Are we releasing all the modules with our current standard distro.

> what I want to say is that we need a proper boundry definition about
> what should goes to minimal distribution.
> with some logical reasoning. Otherwise we have to discuss this again
> when implementing.

Agreed. That is why I made this a proposal rather than a vote :). We
discussed this packaging issues couple of times and changed packaging
couple of time. When Axis2 evolves and we get more insight in to user
experience, we might want to change ourselves to cater for this
requirements. I myself found it bit difficult/confused to use Axis2 once
as a user. That is why I am proposing sth like this.

Yes, let's discuss about this. And we might also want to revise this
once the next release manager (Amila will it be you ;) ) try to
implement this packaging proposal.

So are we agreed to this three level distro?

Thanks,
Chinthaka
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHJ09HjON2uBzUhh8RAoDSAJ9DKYjtCRqEU/jiQnMnKm7oF0UzzQCgqd5z
6SUmDsDsirjOF6j5WuAu9EA=
=ZWKs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to