-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There seems to be slight misunderstanding. What Lawrence as asking is that will we generate just one jar out of the names modules and include that in the minimal (I'd like to this to be called as core distro) distribution. I think we agreed to that. So as Amila mentioned there won't be 5 jars (namely axis2-adb-codegen-SNAPSHOT.jar, axis2-adb-SNAPSHOT.jar, axis2-codegen-SNAPSHOT.jar, axis2-java2wsdl-SNAPSHOT.jar, axis2-kernel-SNAPSHOT.jar ) in the core distro. It will be just axis2-core-<version>.jar.
About Woden axiom implementation. Yes I prefer to have that. But is it maintained now. I know Oshani was working on that for her SoC, but can we use it as it is now and ship only that. Aren't there any changes in the DOMReader that should be implemented in the AxiomReader? If not then I am +1 for using that. Thanks, Chinthaka Lawrence Mandel wrote: > Hi Amila, > > 1. From what I read I thought one of the issues (and an issue that I > raised) was the large number of Axis2 jars. I understood from the > conversation that's been taking place that the function in the many Axis > jars would be rolled up into 3 (or 5) jars, not 3 zip (or tar, etc.) > distros containing many jar files. > > 2. There are two Woden implementations: DOM based and OM (Axiom) based. > Previously these two distributions were packed together in one jar but > they've recently been separated to reduce the number of dependencies when > using one or the other. (Adopters will likely want to use either DOM or > OM.) The DOM jar is required if you're using the Woden DOM implementation. > Likewise, the OM jar is required when using the Axiom based > implementation. I should have been clearer in my question, does Axis2 use > the Woden Axiom based implementation or the Woden DOM based > implementation? > > Thanks, > > Lawrence > > > > > "Amila Suriarachchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 11/01/2007 02:14 AM > Please respond to > axis-dev@ws.apache.org > > > To > axis-dev@ws.apache.org > cc > > Subject > Re: [Axis2] Axis2 Release Restructuring > > > > > > > > > On 11/1/07, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Amila, > > Thanks for summarizing the conversation. I take it your summary is for the > Axis2 server bundle that's been discussed. Two issues: > > 1. Will the 5 Axis2 jars be rolled up into a single Axis2-server jar as > has been requested and discussed? > > No. we are not going to shift as five modules. > It going to be only three. > 1. minimal distribution > 2. full distribution > 3. tools distribution > > the difference between minimal and full is that minimal distribution > contains jars required > for only basic set of use cases(as I have given earlier). It has both > client and server jars. > > 2. You listed > woden-impl-dom-1.0-incubating-20071018.161106-2.jar > Woden has an Axiom based implementation that I thought was contributed to > support Axis2. > So is this an optional jar? > > Is the Axiom implementation not in use in Axis2? > > Axis2 uses the axiom. What I asked is, whether it is necessary to shif > doom implementation as well. > > Amila. > > Thanks, > > Lawrence > > > > > "Amila Suriarachchi" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 11/01/2007 12:16 AM > Please respond to > axis-dev@ws.apache.org > > > To > axis-dev@ws.apache.org > cc > > Subject > Re: [Axis2] Axis2 Release Restructuring > > > > > > > So shall we first conclue what should be included into the minimal > distribution? > > I would like to discribe the minimal distribution as follows, > It inclues the minimal set of jars which some one needs to creates a > webservice > using either > 1. Contract first approach > here we going to provide only the default data binding support > 2. Code first approach > POJO support > > and access them using the generated stub or > RPCService client. Here he can use addressing since it is a basic we > service spec and only with http transport. > > So the minimal distribution contains the following features > 1. Codegen support with adb > 2. POJO support > 3. MTOM (when we includes the axiom and axis2 kernal anyway we get this) > 4. Addressing > 5. Samples ( only for above features) > > is this enogh or is there any thing to add or remove? > > As I guess here are the jars we need for that, > > Axis2 jars > 1. axis2-adb-codegen-SNAPSHOT.jar > 2. axis2-adb-SNAPSHOT.jar > 3. axis2-codegen-SNAPSHOT.jar > 4. axis2-java2wsdl-SNAPSHOT.jar > 5. axis2-kernel-SNAPSHOT.jar > > ws jars > 1. axiom-api-20071017.164440-781.jar > 2. axiom-impl-20071017.164440-780.jar ( > (do we need axiom-dom-20071017.164440-780.jar?) > 3. neethi-20071017.164823-761.jar > 4. woden-api-1.0-incubating-20071018.161106-2.jar > 5. woden-impl-dom-1.0-incubating-20071018.161106-2.jar > 6. wsdl4j-1.6.2.jar > 7. XmlSchema-SNAPSHOT.jar > > other jars > 1. activation-1.1.jar > 2. annogen-0.1.0.jar > 3. backport-util-concurrent-2.2.jar > 4. commons-codec-1.3.jar > 5. commons-fileupload-1.1.1.jar > 6. commons-httpclient-3.0.1.jar > 7. commons-io-1.2.jar > 8. commons-logging-1.1.jar > 9. geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.jar > 10. geronimo-stax-api_1.0_spec- 1.0.jar > 11. httpcore-4.0-alpha5.jar > 12. httpcore-nio-4.0-alpha5.jar > 13. httpcore-niossl-4.0-alpha5.jar > 14. jalopy-1.5rc3.jar > 15. jaxen-1.1.1.jar > 16. jettison-1.0-RC1.jar > 17. log4j-1.2.14.jar > 18. stax-api-1.0.1.jar > 19. wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar > 20. xalan-2.7.0.jar > 21. xercesImpl-2.8.1.jar > 22. xml-apis-1.3.03.jar > > Are there any thing to add or remove? > Here any way 34 jars are there. and we have left 24 jars. > > thanks, > Amila. > > On 10/30/07, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > >> I have misunderstood the thing. >> you mean >> 1. minimal distribution with >> server,client and kernal >> 2. full distribution with >> minmal + optional >> 3. Tools distribution with >> tools > > Exactly yes. I am not sure whether we need to expand full distro also in > to two. Are we releasing all the modules with our current standard distro. > > >> what I want to say is that we need a proper boundry definition about >> what should goes to minimal distribution. >> with some logical reasoning. Otherwise we have to discuss this again >> when implementing. > > Agreed. That is why I made this a proposal rather than a vote :). We > discussed this packaging issues couple of times and changed packaging > couple of time. When Axis2 evolves and we get more insight in to user > experience, we might want to change ourselves to cater for this > requirements. I myself found it bit difficult/confused to use Axis2 once > as a user. That is why I am proposing sth like this. > > Yes, let's discuss about this. And we might also want to revise this > once the next release manager (Amila will it be you ;) ) try to > implement this packaging proposal. > > So are we agreed to this three level distro? > > Thanks, > Chinthaka - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - -- Amila Suriarachchi, WSO2 Inc. - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHKooDjON2uBzUhh8RAoP9AJwI47B7nTh4vsbbn1HqCC2zCm1oKQCgifAT 5XfLSKzmE77tE10nj0YDG/c= =S7dY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
