Hi Anne, Thanks for the response. Here is what we were able to get working with Axis 1.4, and have been struggling with Axis 2... Our input message contained TWO parts, one destined for the body, and the other destined for the header (we set this up in the binding). The header contains security info that gets used by WSSJ - pretty typical usage best we can tell.
When we ran WSDL2Java using Axis 1.4, the resulting stubs resulted in a method signature for each of the methods that looked something like: message (header, body). Using Axis2, the WSDL does get parsed correctly (even though we have defined two parts for the input message), but the resulting method signature in the skeleton code always turns out like: message(header) Note the body is absent, even though it was set up to be one of the two parts for the message. Other than the fact that we need to pack our security tokens into the header, the WSDL is pretty basic. I can't rule out that transmogrifying the WSDL to work with Axis 2 has led to some errors creeping in - at this point, we've been staring at it for quite a while and can't see what we may be doing wrong. I'm attaching the WSDL here - perhaps someone can eyeball a problem we've missed. Note the header/body setup in the binding - we construct the binding by hand - is there any way to annotate a message part as being destined for the header so that we could use Eclipse WTP to generate the binding automagically? Thanks. \Sarwar "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/06/2007 03:08 PM Please respond to axis-user@ws.apache.org To axis-user@ws.apache.org cc Subject Re: Axis2: skeleton differences w/Axis 1.4 "changing a few 'types' to 'elements'" tells me that the original WSDL was defined as style="rpc", and my guess is that it used RPC/encoded. Unfortunately, you have to do a little more than just tweak the "types" to "elements". For one thing, when using document style, your message may contain at monst one body element. That element must reference an element definition in your types section that contains all your input parameters. See my blog on wrapped document/literal for some guidance: http://atmanes.blogspot.com/2005/03/wrapped-documentliteral-convention.html Anne On 2/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > Just wondering if anyone has encountered this: > Using WSDL2JAVA on Axis 1.4, our endpoint binding implementation > automagically produced method signatures that took into account multiple > arguments. > Using the same WSDL in Axis 2.0, the skeleton generated has a method > signature with only one of the required types as an argument. The second one > seems to have disappeared. > > The only 'tweaks' we have made to the WSDL for Axis 2 involve changing a few > 'types' to 'elements' to get the WSDL2JAVA to parse the WSDL. > > Can anyone eyeball something we may be missing? > > Thanks > \Sarwar --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ax2_sample.wsdl
Description: Binary data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
