Hi Nandana & Arlindo,
Thankyou very much for clearing that up! Much appreciated!> Date: Sat, 29 Mar
2008 17:56:02 +0530> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Message Level Security> > Hi Shams,> > > surely rampart is message
level security... end to end security...> > transport level security is like
TLS/SSL,,, point to point security...> > Adding some points ...> > Rampart can
be used with Transport level security ( where the messages> are actually
protected by the transport ) and Rampart validates> whether the message arrived
through a secure a transport. For example> take Username token over HTTPS
scenario. Here the message protection> is transport level security and Rampart
provides the authentication.> Rampart also validates incoming transport to
check whether it is> "https".> > When Rampart signs and encrypts messages or
parts of the messages as> in your scenario, it is message level security. You
will find this [1]> comparison useful.> > thanks,> /nandana> > [1] -
http://xyzws.com/kbdatabase/TLevel_vs_MLevel_Security.html> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------> To
unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
_________________________________________________________________
The next generation of Windows Live is here
http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live
