The Parental Matching is a tool to help you split your match list into
paternal and maternal matches. If that's not of use to you, then no need to
identify who is who or to link them.

Hopefully most people will get into doing the Parental Matching so FTDNA
can use the statistics to improve the range estimates, especially on
endogamous populations. Cheri

Cheri Mello
Listowner, Azores-Gen
Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente,
Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, M. Stringer <strin...@mstringer.net> wrote:

> Hi Cheri,
>
>
>
> That was fast.  Thanks.  That puts my ‘lowish’ numbers in a reasonable
> framework.
>
>
>
> OK.  Forgot that the numbers go down in a pattern per the generations.
> Given the similar (and changing) names I see (or think I see) some
> potential for interfamily relationships.
>
>
>
> I have a direct-line tree on FTDNA (re-keyed all in the one on the site).
> I’d be OK with participating in an ‘all in one ish’ tree if it was a
> separate item, but want to keep the ‘working’ tree more trimmed  – too
> visually confusing. Wished they left the prior system in place.  Meanwhile,
> I add direct line others to my master tree
>
>
>
> I was stuck for some while with the lack of typical name patterns and
> making no progress.  Here’s how I broke through the block:
>
>
>
> Visual Aids (to ‘see’ and ‘sort’ the various spellings)
>
> Created an Excel chart in which I entered each event entry name on a
> separate line
>
> Ref
>
> Event
>
> First Name
>
> Middle Name
>
> Last Name
>
> Location Name
>
> Notes
>
> Rep4, #3
>
> M Jose + Bernarda
>
> Jose
>
> Francisco
>
> Dutra
>
>
>
> 5 Feb 1844, Conceicao, Terceira,  Groom
>
> Rep4, #3
>
> M Jose + Bernarda
>
> Jose
>
> Antonio
>
> Dutra
>
>
>
> f/o Jose Francisco; Piedade, Pico Island
>
> Rep4, #3
>
> M Jose + Bernarda
>
> Rita
>
> Candida
>
>
>
>
>
> m/o Jose Francisco
>
> Rep4, #3
>
> M Jose + Bernarda
>
> Bernarda
>
> Candida
>
>
>
>
>
> 5 Feb 1844, Conceicao, Terceira,  Bride
>
> Rep4, #3
>
> M Jose + Bernarda
>
> Jose
>
>
>
> Silveira
>
>
>
> f/o Bernarda; Piedade, Pico Island
>
> Rep4, #3
>
> M Jose + Bernarda
>
> Bernarda
>
> Mariana
>
>
>
>
>
> m/o Bernarda;
>
> Rep4, #3
>
> M Jose + Bernarda
>
> Antonio
>
> Leonardo Pires
>
> Toste
>
>
>
> witness, married
>
> Rep4, #3
>
> M Jose + Bernarda
>
> Jose
>
> Antonio
>
> Coelho
>
>
>
> witness, married
>
>
>
> On a separate page, sorted to see the variant entries (edited my file from
> Candida to da Conceicao)
>
> Ref
>
> Event
>
> Location Name
>
> First Name
>
> Middle Name
>
> Last Name
>
> Notes
>
> Rep1, #8
>
> Bap Jose Machado
>
>
>
> Rita
>
> Candida
>
>
>
> mo Jose Francisco
>
> Rep2, #1
>
> Bap Elisia
>
>
>
> Rita
>
> da Conceicao
>
>
>
> mo Jose Francisco
>
> Rep2, #2
>
> Bap Manoel
>
>
>
> Rita
>
> da Conceicao
>
>
>
> mo Jose Francisco
>
> Rep4, #3
>
> M Jose + Bernarda
>
>
>
> Rita
>
> Candida
>
>
>
> m/o Jose Francisco
>
> Rep5, #1
>
> B Jose Francisco Dutra
>
>
>
> Rita
>
> da Conceicao
>
>
>
> mo Jose, native of Lajes, Pico Island
>
> Rep5, #2
>
> M AntonioDutra Rita
>
>
>
> Rita
>
> da Conceicao
>
>
>
> 19Feb1819, Lajes, Pico Island, Bride
>
> Rep5, #4
>
> D Rita da Conceicao
>
>
>
> Rita
>
> da Conceicao
>
>
>
> D 24Sep1876, house in Silveira, Lajes, Pico Island; 77, housewife
>
>
>
> Created a sub-section to collect unidentified godparents and witnesses.
> Pretty sure some/several will turn out to be extended families.
>
>
>
> XMatch Chart
>
> Printed the Fan Chart option you suggested, as available in Family
> TreeMaker: 6gen; 6 pages; big circle vs fan diagrams on DNA sites
>
>
>
> Decided to play with an ancestry chart, using my grandmother as the
> starting person.
>
> The result is a  simpler visual – much easier on the eyes;
> straight/aligned chart; 6gen from her vs me; 3 pages;
>
> Outlined the XMatch people per the diagrams
>
>
>
>
>
> Marsha Stringer
>
> strin...@mstringer.net
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* azores@googlegroups.com [mailto:azores@googlegroups.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Cheri Mello
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 12:09 PM
> *To:* Azores Genealogy
> *Subject:* Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] First Identified DNA Match
>
>
>
> If you are 3C1R on paper, yes, a 55 cM block does support that.
>
> X matches need to be 10 cM or more. Otherwise, it's too far back. You
> share 5.3 cMs with Pat on the X. So don't bother trying to figure that one
> out.
>
> You need get Pat's lineage into your tree and upload a new Gedcom to
> FTDNA. Link Pat. Although the Parental Matching only goes to 3C right now,
> you'll have the 3C1R there ready to go when they expand the Parental
> Matching beyond the 3C level.
>
> Cheri
>
>
> Cheri Mello
> Listowner, Azores-Gen
> Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente,
> Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Azores Genealogy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.

Reply via email to