Ian Betteridge wrote:
On 15/06/07, *Stephen Deasey* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    There are two types of programmes: those the BBC owns rights to, and
    those it doesn't.  One argument against releasing BBC owned programmes
    without DRM on the Internet is that it would make it difficult to then
    also sell it to Fox, for example.

Yeah, but don't forget that even when the BBC is the producer of a programme, it is not the sole rights holder. Programmes where the BBC owns all rights in perpetuity with no residual payments due are very rare - mostly news, some (but not all) documentaries, and very old archive footage. It can be really hard for anyone not connected to the media to get their head round, but programmes don't have all their production costs set up front and then nothing beyond that. If a series is rebroadcast, lots of people associated with it are due additional payments. It's a very finely balanced system which basically works: without it, almost no actors would ever make a living out of acting (and remarkably few do already).

Ian is absolutely correct. It is extremely easy for those outside of media-land to tell us how we should be running our businesses without having walked a few miles in our shoes and being exposed to the whole messy compliancey process.

Here's a case in point that may be pertinent to freeing up content for use online (remebering that large swathes of content were first comissioned without even thinking about how the internet may affect distribution models). Many years ago at a well known newspaper all copy that was appearing online had to be resubbed by other online-centred journos as the contracts were not in place to use the original copy on the website. Effectively this meant that to publish a piece in the paper and online some journalists would be paid twice. Why? Because their contracts of employment were written at a time when electronic dissemination of their work was not thought of.

This has now been resolved but it highlights an issue with making arhives of data available for which there is no prior agreement and for which agreement has to be sought or paid for.

Seán


-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.  To unsubscribe, please 
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.  
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/

Reply via email to