If it is low quality or small already i.e. an icon it qualifies as fair use? IANAL, however.
On 22/07/07, Kim Plowright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/07/07, "~:'' ありがとうございました。" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the quality of images used as links is unlikely to present a "rights" > issue. It doesn't matter how small a picture is, it's still copyright > in fact fair use probably covers this in any case. No, no it doesnt. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
-- Gary Kirk - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
