On 06/12/2007, vijay chopra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And you are free to carry on misrepresenting my argument.
That is actually the first time you've disagreed with my point. How am I misrepresenting your argument? I'm genuinely open to correction. From how I parse your arguments you are saying "just like free speech, people should be able to take software and redistribute it with whatever licencing they choose" which is the same as saying "just like free speech, people should be able to take software and take any action they like with it." This simply doesn't make any sense to me. -- Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/> "Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
