David Rees wrote:

> On 3/29/07, Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>>I didnt blame anybody, just said BackupPC is working slow and it was working
>>slow, very slow indeed. checksum-seeds option seems to be doing it's trick 
>>though.
> 
> 
> How long are full and incremental backups taking now?

In one machine it went down from 900 minutes to 175 minutes. I expect better 
performance
when more memory is added (today or tomorrow they will add it) and I dont think 
all
files had checksums cached when this full was ran.

  Totals         Existing Files          New Files
Backup#         Type    #Files  Size/MB         MB/sec  #Files  Size/MB         
#Files  Size/MB
245      full    280030          7570.4          0.14    274205          6797.6 
         10578           776.3
252      full    283960          8020.8          0.76    276665          6959.3 
         12232           1065.0

         Existing Files          New Files
Backup#         Type    Comp Level      Size/MB         Comp/MB         Comp    
Size/MB         Comp/MB         Comp
245      full    9       6797.6          3868.9          43.1%           776.3  
         368.7           52.5%
252      full    9       6959.3          4056.9          41.7%           1065.0 
         539.0           49.4%

> 
>>I am thankful to people who wrote suggestions here in this forum, I tried all 
>>of
>>those suggestions one by one. I think that shows that I took them seriously 
>>even
>>though some of them looked like long shots. Eventually one of the suggestions
>>seems to be working.
> 
> 
> You only tried 2 things. Mounting the backup partition async and
> turning on checksum-seeds. Are you going to the 2 others? (Add memory
> and try tar instead of rsync)

The memory will be added. As I mentioned before the machine is at a remote 
location
and the guys there should add it.

I could try tar for testing purposes if you like? I think rsync will be 
sufficiently
fast enough. I am guessing that with checksum-seeds the difference shouldnt be 
so much
tar probably transfers much more data in full backups? Rsync can be faster 
perhaps if
ignore-times was removed when taking full backups. I am thinking of removing 
ignore-times
option from full backups with rsync and see how much it effects for seeing the 
difference.

> -Dave
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

Reply via email to