Rich Rauenzahn wrote: > > dan wrote: >> no, incrementals are more efficient on bandwidth. they do a less >> strenuous test to determine if a file has changed. >> >> at the expense of CPU power on both sides, you can compress the rsync >> traffic either with rsync -z > Have you tried rsync -z? Last I heard, BackupPC's rsync modules don't > support it. > > Rich
I tried it a long time back, it was not pretty. Backups failed to complete... after backing up for 24 hours or more. Don't do it. Nick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
