2016-01-11 17:28 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com>: > I haven't used v4 but it sounds like you have some issue with your > network, rsync, or lack of resources. The main difference between a > full and incremental should just be that the full will do a complete > read on the client side. The actual data transferred should not be > much different. If it works the same as v3, the block checksums are > not cached until the 2nd full backup of a file, so the 3rd and > subsequent full runs become faster since the server does not have to > uncompress everything for the comparison. My usual approach with v3 > was to start a full run on a Friday before leaving work so it would > have the whole weekend to complete for the first few runs and would > generally stay well enough on schedule to keep fulls on a weekend.
I don't have any issue with my network, the same server, with Bacula (i'm running Bacula and BackupPC on the same server, obviously one per time) will backup the same huge client in 16 hours, not 3 days. Same server, same disks, same network, same client. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/