2016-01-11 18:18 GMT+01:00 Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <chr...@real-time.com>: > For initial transfers, rsync is notably slower than tar or the like (I don't > remember how Bacula does it). After the initial transfers tho, it should get > faster. If you're still seeing this slowness after a couple of transfers, > there probably is a deficiency in BackupPC's programming (or maybe you just > have a wierd corner case).
plain rsync, is much faster than rsync managed by BPC, with plain rsync i'm able to sync the whole server in about 16-18 hours (mostly the same Bacula does) rsync managed by BPC requires 2 days, so, rsync is not the issue. Probably BPC is doing some additional checks during the file transfer, checks that should be done AFTER the whole transfer, to free up the client's resources as fast as possible. > Have you tried setting up BackupPC to use tar (or smbtar) rather than rsync > for your transfers? I can't, I can't configure ssh between backup server and clients for security reason and internal policy. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ BackupPC-users mailing list BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforge.net List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
