Kern Sibbald <[email protected]> writes: > Yes, I am suggesting that all distros should use the Bacula > recommended configuration. We can then automate a lot of nice > stuff.
why not just use --prefix=/opt/bacula ? the installed files will still be a simple collection of files. I don't think there needs to be a contradiction between LSB[*] and the Bacula recommendation. [*] or similar documents, LSB is not very far away from FreeBSD or Solaris file layouts, it's small stuff like /usr/share/man rather than /usr/man. > Unfortunately, life is generally much more complicated than that -- > first, how do you recover Bacula? Without your bacula-dir.conf, > bacula-sd.conf, bacula-fd.conf files, plugins, modifications to > scripts such as the autochanger, ... you will have problems. The > new Bacula proposed installation permits very easy restoration of > all that. with --prefix=/opt/bacula, I would like the configuration to be in /opt/bacula/etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf etc. (in 2.4, Bacula drops everything directly in $sysconfdir, i.e. /usr/local/etc by default, which is quite messy. a subdirectory makes it clearer, and it's not a big hassle even if Bacula is installed in a separate prefix.) -- Kjetil T. Homme Redpill Linpro AS - Changing the game ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Bacula-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-devel
