On 1/24/19 4:15 PM, mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu wrote: > Putting it very bluntly, the data in Bacula's database is the only > important component. Your tool -- and every other GUI front-end -- is a > convenience, not a necessary part of the backup infrastructure, and your > tool (and every other GUI front-end to Bacula) is much, much less mature > and less trusted.
Even if it is, unless it comes with bacula from bacula, there is no guarantee that the next version of the core software will not add more database objects with a name clash. Or change the schema in a way that breaks your tool. Having the pieces fall in the same database that holds my super-important backup catalog is just... like I said: !@#$ck no. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
