I distinctly remember the sense of liberation experiences by Guy Marchand in 1987 upon gaining a centimeter of bridge spacing on his 13c!
RT

On 6/24/2014 10:14 PM, r.turov...@gmail.com wrote:
I think people who play with nails can get some mileage out of narrow spacing, but flesh players need to be in the 155mm vicinity.
RT



On 6/24/2014 7:51 PM, sterling price wrote:
I think it depends on what your'e used to. My first 13 course had 157mm and that is what I learned on, and I try to only play lutes with that
    spacing. Once I had a lute for 6 months that was much smaller (say
around 145 cm) and I couldn't stand it. I could never hit the correct
    bass notes. I know Barto uses 155cm. I tend to favor lutes of the
    Edlinger school which tend to be bigger I think than Hoffman and
    Schelle lutes. I also prefer lutes with a longer string length like
    over 76 cm. I would love to try one of the 80cm 13 course lutes.
    Sterling
    On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:53 PM, Anton Birula
    <image...@cs.dartmouth.edu> wrote:
I am really surprised.... Having played londer than 23 years, I never had an instrument wider than 147 which I play. Everyone who played my
    lutes would say that it is a bit widish.... Also as far as I know,
    Hoppy Smith, Nigel North, Konrad Junghanel, Toyohiko Satoh, Jacob
    Lindberg and many others have lutes narrower than 147. It is really
    remarkable to hear that people have such wide spacing around. What
about late Weiss Suites from Dresden manuscript Nr 23,24, 25, 30? How
    do these work on that spacings?
    Best wishes, AB
    --------------------------------------------
On Tue, 6/24/14, Matthew Daillie <[1]dail...@club-internet.fr> wrote:
    Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: Swan Neck Baroque Lute for sale
    To: "Christopher Wilke" <[2]chriswi...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Cc: "John Lenti" <[3]johnle...@hotmail.com>, "[4]r.turov...@gmail.com"
    <[5]r.turov...@gmail.com>, "sterling price"
    <[6]spiffys84...@yahoo.com>, "[7]baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu"
    <[8]baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
    Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014, 9:07 PM
    The difficulty comes from having to
    drill a new hole very close to an old one. Even if the
    latter is well plugged, the drill bit often finds its way
    back into the original hole. It is also tricky to make sure
    the bit comes out the other side exactly where you want it
    to (after all, we are talking about fractions of
    millimetres). Anyway, ask any reputable maker, it's not a
    job they enjoy doing (and I have had it done on a couple of
    my lutes). Some makers prefer to make a new bridge which can
    be glued on to the soundboard without it being removed, but
    others would only consider fitting a new bridge with the top
    off.
    best
    Matthew
    On 24 juin 2014, at 18:26, Christopher Wilke
    <[9]chriswi...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
    wrote:
    > Nothing difficult about it at all. I've drilled a few
    holes myself on lutes and a baroque guitar and I have zero
    wood working skills. I used a little tiny hobby drill that I
    bought from Michael's hobby supply. It's basically just a
    short aluminum handle like an Exacto knife with a little
    drill bit set into it. You just physically rotate it back
    and forth by hand. It's so small, you can get it close and
    parallel with the soundboard. If you're not an experienced
    bridge-hole-driller, the real advantage is that you have
    plenty of time to recognize and correct your aim as you go.
    >
    > Chris
    >
    > Dr. Christopher Wilke D.M.A.
    > Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
    > www.christopherwilke.com
    >
    > --------------------------------------------
    > On Tue, 6/24/14, Matthew Daillie <[10]dail...@club-internet.fr>
    wrote:




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to