At the risk of being demonized for mentioning it, I'll try to assert my 
singular and no doubt flawed opinion that I think your audience is not enjoying 
this "banter" as much as you think it is.  You really should not be using 
"reply all" here if you're both sincere in your stated intents.

> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:30:46 -0700
> From: r...@linuxmafia.com
> To: basfa@lists.basfa.org
> Subject: Re: [Basfa] BASFA minutes for September 7
> 
> Quoting Glenn Glazer (glenn.gla...@gmail.com):
> 
> > This is called ad hominem.  If you are going to do that, you've lost
> > me as a conversation partner.
> 
> Deirdre and Cheryl might have the right to be aggrieved -- if the
> characterisation weren't already one they laughingly acknowledge to be
> true.  I didn't say your non-sequitur conviction that I must be trying
> to convince you of something, just because I'm talking to you, makes
> _you_ self-centred.  That would be massive overgeneralisation.
> 
> As an aside, nor did I say there's anything wrong with being a
> stereotypical only-child type, either.  Heck, I even married one and
> accepted another as a household member.
> 
> Anyway, have fun sharecropping for Google.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Basfa mailing list
> Basfa@lists.basfa.org
> http://lists.basfa.org/listinfo.cgi/basfa-basfa.org
                                          
_______________________________________________
Basfa mailing list
Basfa@lists.basfa.org
http://lists.basfa.org/listinfo.cgi/basfa-basfa.org

Reply via email to