Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think that this should still be the default.
>
> Hmm bbdb-get-only-first-address-p should have been t,
> well I fix that.
I guess this may be good enough.
> > The current setup seems to generate a lot more complaints,
> > plus it's buggy in that the hook functions don't get an
> > indication of whether the current record is From, To, Cc,
> > or something else.
>
> Of what use would it be to hook functions, BTW what hook
> functions, those calls in bbdb-annotate-message-sender?
Like anything you write for bbdb/mail-auto-create-p or stuff from the
bbdb-auto-notes-alist. The bbdb-auto-notes-hook was taking stuff like
Organization and adding it to all the recipients as well as the
sender. I use this as my alist:
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-alist
'(("user-agent" (".*" interface 0 t))
("X-Mailer" (".*" interface 0 t))
("X-Newsreader" (".*" interface 0 t))
("Organization" (".*" company 0))
))
> Probably there should have been a distinction between three
> classes 'author, 'recipient and 'unknown. And probably new
> variable bbdb-get-addresses-headers with '((author . "From"
> ...) (recipient . "To" ..') ...) and a function
> bbdb-annotate-person (CLASS ADDRESS ...).
>
> Opened for discussion: Is there anyone having a need for that?
I can see how that might be usefull. But it seems like the
bbdb-auto-notes-hook needs to at least be updated to know about the
addition of the recipients. It seems like the layout for the alist
would also need to change somehow.
--
(__) Doug Alcorn (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lathi.net)
oo / PGP 02B3 1E26 BCF2 9AAF 93F1 61D7 450C B264 3E63 D543
|_/ If you're a capitalist and you have the best goods and they're
free, you don't have to proselytize, you just have to wait.
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
