Thanks for the bug report & fix.
> - Expansion of bbdb-auto-notes-rules looks cheap operation to me
> so caching is unnecessary. Not worth the trouble of user having
> to remember changing bbdb-auto-notes-rules-expanded to nil
> whenever they change bbdb-auto-notes-rules.
I guess this might depend on various issues like number of patterns
and number of messages to browse. -- I have no strong feelings here.
Maybe the code for processing the patterns can be optimized such
that the overhead for expanding the patterns does not play any role.
> - Another annoyance is that FIELD could only name those in NOTES.
> For example:
>
> (setq bbdb-auto-notes-rules
> '(("Organization" (".*" organization "\\&"))))
>
> does not update the organisation of the record.
When I quickly looked through some folders, I did not have the
impression that Organization headers were used extensively.
In that sense, I am tempted to give this lower priority. But patches
are always welcome!
Anyway, the function bbdb-auto-notes does not care about note fields
vs. other fields. It would be bbdb-annotate-notes and/or
bbdb-merge-note that need to be modified.
Roland
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
