On 2011-05-09 02:59 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote: > In principle there is no ambiguityconcerning lists and strings. All > bbdb fields except for names and individual note fields are lists > (and different notes are again forming a list). > > For your issue, a cleaner solution might be an optional argument > merge for bbdb-record-set-field. That could make bbdb-annotate-notes > completely obsolete. Do you want to look into this?
OK, I'll look into this. Is the intention to extend BBDB-record-set-field to support setting sub-fields of notes too? Leo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
