On 2011-05-08 12:06 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote:
[elide 7 lines]
> I guess this might depend on various issues like number of patterns
> and number of messages to browse. -- I have no strong feelings here.
> Maybe the code for processing the patterns can be optimized such
> that the overhead for expanding the patterns does not play any role.
I have no strong feelings either. So maybe leave it for now.
>> - Another annoyance is that FIELD could only name those in NOTES.
>> For example:
>>
>> (setq bbdb-auto-notes-rules
>> '(("Organization" (".*" organization "\\&"))))
>>
>> does not update the organisation of the record.
>
> When I quickly looked through some folders, I did not have the
> impression that Organization headers were used extensively.
> In that sense, I am tempted to give this lower priority. But patches
> are always welcome!
Indeed. I have locally advised bbdb-annotate-notes to support
organisation header field.
The trouble with supporting the standard BBDB fields is that they may
accept different types: lists or strings etc.
>
> Anyway, the function bbdb-auto-notes does not care about note fields
> vs. other fields. It would be bbdb-annotate-notes and/or
> bbdb-merge-note that need to be modified.
>
> Roland
Leo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
