On 2011-09-24 03:27 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote: > When I looked at this once more I thought that this could be > something more people might like to use so that it could become part > of the "BBDB trunk". Namely: > > There could be an optional note field `name-face' similar to > `creation-date' and `timestamp'. This note field could either > directly hold the name of a face that font-lock will use for > highlighting the name of a record. Or the value of name-face could > be a key which gets translated to a face via something like > `bbdb-name-face-alist'. (Even both of these schemes could exist in > parallel.)
I am fine with anything that allows one to enter organisation-only records nicely. For example, dividing "Lucky Star Buffet Restaurant" into firstname and lastname is not nice. We should get rid of that. Leo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
