On Fri Aug 31 2012 Leo wrote: > On 2012-08-30 23:27 +0800, Roland Winkler wrote: > > Should bbdb-mua-update-interactive-p turned into a list instead of a > > cons pair to offer yet more flexibility? > > The level of indirection here looks like a sign of over-engineering. We > should make the user commands (bbdb-mua-edit-field-sender etc) > straightforward to understand and customise without needing to read too > many places.
My intention was to have one user variable bbdb-mua-update-interactive-p for all MUA commands so that all these commands behave similarly according to what the user wants. What do you propose instead more specifically? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ bbdb-info@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info BBDB Home Page: http://bbdb.sourceforge.net/
