I've always found that it is best to pick the tool that does the job you need it to do rather than alter the tool to do the job. That's why I have six image editors (of which I often use only two), one text editor (guess), one spreadsheet editor, and a few word processors.
I rarely use the word processor--despite it's huge list of "features"--because of its unwieldy nature and propensity to really mess things up. On the surface it may look pretty, but what happens beneath is a seething cesspool. Best wishes, Bucky On May 5, 2014, at 9:19 PM, Rick Yentzer <ryent...@gmail.com> wrote: > That makes sense and I can understand their reasoning. I guess it will be up > to the enduser to evaluate if BBEdit as is fits their needs and workflow. -- This is the BBEdit Talk public discussion group. If you have a feature request or would like to report a problem, please email "supp...@barebones.com" rather than posting to the group. Follow @bbedit on Twitter: <http://www.twitter.com/bbedit> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BBEdit Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bbedit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bbedit@googlegroups.com.
