> We dont need to wait to have an after dinner discussion about the use of
> radionics to make rain. If it is possible for Hugh to break the drought
over
> eastern Australia I am sure that there would be many more people would pay
> far larger amonts of money than proposed by Hugh for successful completion
> of an atmospheric regeneration assignment.
> Kind regards
> James
>
Dear James
                      "Break the drought over eastern Australia" - that
would be somethin' wouldnt it!
Lets be realistic for a minute or two
We have had a lot of cloud formation pass over us this winter - some of them
looked very promising for rain - but lacked the necessary trigger, in most
cases the atmospheric pressure was too high / didnt drop low enough (I have
studied this a fair bit over the last few years). I believe there was
potential there to generate rainfall on a few occasions. I called Gil's help
one time and he came so very close to getting it to work - there was useful
rain east of us up to an inch from that front. Had I been better organised
and both of us better prepared that time - who knows what may have happened?
It would not have taken a lot of rain this winter to negate most of the
disaster and suffering that we will see from crop failures, two more inches,
well timed would have made a fantastic amount of difference. Maybe we have
to have these dry times as part of the natural order of things, but when you
look at the records, there is very little difference between a lot of ok but
dry seasons and some of the worst droughts, its a small amount of rainfall
difference and timing and size of falls. If this was the Tasmanian hydro
catchment CSIRO would have seeded several of these frontal systems and got
rain - they won't do it up here because they are scared of being sued by
those farmers that miss out on rain or suffer damage from storm rains. Reich
knew how to do this but the equipment was dangerous, James DeMeo, Trevor
Constable, Colin Croft, all have followed along the same line and got
results but its overpowering stuff and difficult to control - using BD preps
in a subtle way to get to the same end result is a pretty attractive
argument I reckon!
Its not that long back that you were posting about clearing up pollution
over India and someone was saying this had been done over Denver and you
could see the results on the NASA sattellite - 80 miles by 140 miles - ??
Getting a bit of rain to fall from a passing cloud should be no more
difficult surely??
Man this is do-able lets give it a go
Cheers again
Lloyd Charles
ps did you get any (rain) from this last front
pss (If I was just a little bit less frightened of the potential for damage
from one of Croft's cloudbusters I would have one built by now - it would
not be that hard to do nor that expensive - I just think there is a safer
way)

Reply via email to