I got my library to buy A Practical Guide to Vibrational Medicine by Richard Gerber that someone recommended a millennium ago. The chapter on Radionics was actually a history of inventors and practitioners. It helped a lot and some of it was hard for me to understand and then it was explained that the practitioner was a psychic which explained it all. I just need to start from square one and learn how to douse. Those of us who are neophytes need to start at square one to understand what Gil and Hugh and many others know by experience.
There are so many things to learn. I buried 13 horns (got 12 from Joe, a friend in Priest River) with manure sealed with bentonite clay several days ago. (Hugh, how do you make horn clay?) Now I read Steve Storch's description of his horn burying and I want to dig mine up and rebury them with 2002 BD compost or some of the potting soil we put in barrels and sprayed with 500/BC. The Compost Tea Digest 121 is discussing plant respiration and taking brix measurements with a refractometer. I want really badly to do this in the 2003 season and am bothering my Weed Supervisor to let me buy a refractometer on the grant. I'm really concerned about testing for E. coli 157 in my compost pile. My husband made up the pile while I was gone to Lovettsville when he got the use of a truck. (Our truck has been in the shop for a year waiting for an engine rebuild. The engine is in pieces and our mechanic gets to it when he has time.) Herb says there was lots of bedding in the manure from miniature horses and a full-sized one, goats and emus and there was no need to layer it. I've never measured temperature in a compost pile, so I guess I need to buy a thermometer. What kind do I look for? We can't all be perfect. I keep bringing up buying a cow and my husband sighs and says it's impossible here. We would have to clear the trees off 7 acres (5 to grow hay for the winter and 2 for pasture in the summer) and build up the soil. We have to put up a NZ electric game fence and pay more property taxes because that would change the tax designation on the 7 acres. I'm also interested in having chickens, but he says that they would dig up the garden big time unless they were penned. A friend has invented a hen house with four entrances and a movable chicken wire framework. This is all very exciting and frustrating to me. I can dream, but putting things into practice is much, much harder. Best, Merla Gil Robertson wrote: > Hugh and Lloyd, > Regards to both of you. > > I am way behind with my emails, thus the long over due reply. > > James, could I save you a lot of time, in regard to trying to measure Radionic > Instruments, using electrical/ electronic type parameters. The Radio part of > Radionics, is an early misconception by Abrams, who at the time thought that as > Radio was new, his discovery must some how be able to be explained in those > terms. The energy we are dealing with is not electricity, magnetic or for that > matter, electromagnetism. We are dealing with another type of energy, which > demonstrably travels faster than the speed of electricity/ light. Not only can > it travel considerable distances, undiminished, it can travel to other levels > and bring back information on those who have passed over. > > The current developments in Radionics, do not use instruments in the traditional > sense. There are paper based instruments that work faster than the familiar > black box with knobs. > > There is another difficulty in trying to measure instruments. The instrument is > only a focus, the actual "work" is done by the practitioner's mind. So if you > have difficulty getting a satisfactory measurement from an instrument, you may > have to look at the person using it. Taking this one step further, there is > little point measuring an isolated instrument, as, it, it's self, does nothing. > It is the practitioner. It is like taking a set of bagpipes in isolation and > making objective measurements, with no piper. While there are those unbelievers > who do not consider that bagpipes ever produce music, without a trained and much > practised piper, even I will agree that no recognisable music can be discerned. > > SO if you want to make comparative measurements, it is necessary to have some > one actively using an instrument, while a second person makes observations and > using some method, such as dowsing, make some form of value measurement. > > I understand that when the NSW Dowsers did some research on the effectiveness of > a number of instruments, they made a number of standard Homoeopathic Remedies > up, at a number of potencies and also bought current stock from traditional > manufacturers. They covered all the containers and each dowser, dowsed contents > and potency. The results were tabulated and the instrument prepared examples > measured up closer to potency than those off the shelf. There were some > differences in the out put of different instruments, that I should not put in > the public domain, as I was not present and my information is second hand. > > If you examine the innards of most Radionic Instruments, the wiring does not > conform to electronic logic. There are also some subtle details that are not > obvious, so be careful, if buying an instrument, make sure it has been made by a > Radionic Practitioner and not an instrument maker. At the least, consult your > pendulum and ask: "Is this instrument appropriate for me to use to do ....." > > Gil > > James Hedley wrote: > > > Dear Lloyd, > > At no point in my Email did I infer that you should throw away your > > Refractometer or pH meter. Even although I dowse, to me figures or readings > > from an instrument are equally fascinating. > > That is why at this time I am trying to make radionic instruments with very > > sensitive microvolt meters built into them to satisfy myself that I am > > getting the action from radionic instruments that I think that I am > > getting.. Rationalised testing of what I am doing has always been an aim of > > mine. Snip
