>>I don't mean to discourage anyone. Let's keep building awareness, and >>rejection of the vogue agendas such as Monsanto's. But quite frankly I see >>little salvation in this alone. What will help us most is if things get a >>LOT worse. SNIP Like I said, things may have to get a LOT worse >>before they will get significantly better. > >I totally agree with you, Hugh, with the exception that in this >particular case they are playing with the very basis of our >civalization: our basic cultivars and in such a way that there may be >no returning to the plants we have now. Seeing the SUPER WEED Canola >in Schmeiser's slides makes it pretty clear to me that even if things >get bad enough to stop Monsanto, there may never be an opportunity to >grow food plants en masse that contain the same DNA that our >ancestors co-evolved with. Sally Fallon has commented extensively on >how difficult it is for our bodies to actually thrive when estranged >from our traditional food. > >I realize how futile the effort is at this point, Hugh. > >Thank for your good post. -Allan
Allan, I know. So it goes. A similar thing happened in Atlantis. I suppose we will have to become more adaptable. Hugh Visit our website at: www.unionag.org
