Chris Ball <[email protected]> writes: > I agree that the first thing we need is a release, and preferably a > release which gives us more features than any of our competition.
Why would that need to be in the first release? A first release could be version “0.1” or “0.3” or whatever, which clearly communicates that there are major features still to come. I think you're mistakenly conflating “version 1.0”, which is the glint in the eyes of many of the developers's eyes, unnecessarily with “first release”, which is what many of us are waiting for. The first release does not need to blow anyone away. It merely needs to be *released*, as a known state of the code that has some kind of expectation that it will remain stable supported for some time more than some arbitrary VCS revision. -- \ “It's my belief we developed language because of our deep inner | `\ need to complain.” —Jane Wagner, via Lily Tomlin | _o__) | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Be-devel mailing list [email protected] http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel
