On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:29:54 -0400 >>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Ball <[email protected]> wrote:
Chris> Thanks for the encouragement! :-) Chris> I agree that the first thing we need is a release, and Chris> preferably a release which gives us more features than any of Chris> our competition. Chris> (Which is why I'm interested in merging/working on cfbe.) I'm not familiar with neither CherryPy nor (many) other Python frameworks, but just being curious what do you think about Flask (http://flask.pocoo.org/) or there is already enough work done in cfbe? Maybe I'm ignorant, but I'm not aware there is real competition in 'distributed tracker market'...OK, there is Fossil which provides 'all-in-one' solution as well as, afaict, mostly abandoned Ditz with its Python-clone Pitz. Do I miss anything else which is alive? Chris> I think the best *long-term* roadmap for Bugs Everywhere -- and Chris> for distributed bugtracking in general -- is going to involve Chris> finding a way to integrate with a code hosting site like Chris> Gitorious. Sites like GitHub are getting more and more popular, Chris> because you can ask such a site to host your repo without being Chris> locked in to that site, and you further gain being part of a Chris> social network; but then you do suffer lock-in if you use their Chris> bugtracking facilities. Well, I hope LP won't be forgotten...Darcs is my *only* DVCS which I regularly use, for the rest I can live with bzr and its bzr-{git,hg,svn} plugins. Otoh, I prefer to avoid direct involvement with Git. :-) Chris> We've got a great answer to that, I think. I agree it would be awesome to use BE and have public tracker as LP on disposal as well. Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: F96FF5F6 ----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Be-devel mailing list [email protected] http://void.printf.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/be-devel
