I don't see anything wrong.....in this world nothing is "wrong" (other than 
the attitude), there is what is right for someone and what is right for 
most of the people.

In 15 years working as programmer, I have NEVER experienced a single 
developer using VI for anything other than modify server side files (either 
config, daemons, apache config files), or to create quick shell script to 
automate some process.

I've been in plenty of companies, where there were awesome people that had 
40 years of experience, that were so kind to show me how they do their 
job....most of them avoided intentionally VI when they had the chance, 
because they had to work with it in the past, since there was nothing else 
:) Strange enough, nobody loved it, while writing applications of a certain 
size.

If someone likes it as text editor, so be it, but I would not go around 
saying to others that they are "wrong", just because they don't see it in 
the same way. Conflicts are born because someone think that he/she has the 
right to be right, while the others are wrong. Especially in CS, there is 
more than a way to do anything, so the right or wrong is really a matter of 
personal opinion. 

Then again: Emacs and VI are text editors, not Integrated Development 
Environments; for the same reason that a VW beetle with a Porsche engine is 
not a Porsche, a text editor with IDE functionalities is not an IDE....it 
can be used for that purpose, but there are a ton of other easier and more 
reliable alternatives; which means that the use of this or that method is 
purely discretional and based on personal preferences.

The original topic was "is there an IDE for the BB, to avoid cross 
compile?", unless I am mistaken.

Have a good day

On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 8:14:14 AM UTC-8, Alexander Holler wrote:
>
> Am 05.03.2014 13:30, schrieb Karl Longen: 
> > BTW you have never tried to code pages and pages using just VI 
> probably.... 
> > 
> > Any person in their right state of mind would not use VI, unless you are 
> > writing short programs (like shell script), or very simple applications. 
>
> That's just plain wrong and doesn't reflect reality. 
>
> > Renounce to auto correction, color syntax, auto completion, and a ton 
> more 
> > of functionalities, when you are coding millions of lines, is not 
> different 
> > from running win 3.1 on a modern computer :) 
>
> If you really need those things, vim and emacs are offering such stuff 
> too. 
>
> > On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 4:15:11 AM UTC-8, c...@isbd.net wrote: 
>
> >> Open multiple ssh connections to the BBB, run vi in one of them, make 
> >> in another and do testing in a third - the best IDE there is. 
>
> Try <esc>:make in vim. 
>
> Regards, 
>
> Alexander Holler 
>
>

-- 
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to