On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Graham <gra...@flex-radio.com> wrote:
> The Beaglebone is a better choice than say, Raspberry Pi, since Linux is > somewhat locked-down on the R Pi, which puts limits what you can do with it. > This is mostly false. The images provided by the Raspberry PI foundation are rather "odd". However, just like with the beaglebone a user can create their own Linux images. Especially for the rPI2/3's. Since they are able to run armhf code like any other normal ARM system to date. All one needs to know is which files need to be where( text config files, and device tree files, etc ). But, one thing I have not seen yet is instructions for creating, compiling, and "installing" a boot loader for these systems. Presumably one could setup and use a "stock( rPI patched )uboot for this task. The hard part would mostly be finding good solid information on how the hardware is to brought up at, and prior to boot. The graphics processor is also hard to find good solid information on. -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORrRAr_UiSPjcunOnizT_zRwu%2Boc5_y5qVedmMCPVXLA8g%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
