> > Dont treat this as an rPI endorsement however. I much prefer the > beaglebone in most cases, but the rPI, specifically the rPI's has many good > points too. >
Raspberry PI 3 On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:33 PM, William Hermans <yyrk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Graham Haddock <gra...@flexradio.com> > wrote: > >> Hi William: >> >> For an expert, you are totally correct. >> > > I would argue the other way around. the rPI's have stuff like 'wiring', > and are a lot like the Arduino's in many ways. Only running Linux. Me, I'm > not a big fan of anything "Arduino" though . . . > >> >> For a newbie, the Raspberry Pi images seem to be designed to limit how >> much tinkering you can do with Linux itself. >> > > There is a lot more information out there for doing many things. Specific > to the Raspberry PI's versus the beaglebone. However, a lot of that > information is universal. One only need understand the hardware, and the > software which runs it. > >> >> The tools and examples for modifying Linux itself are much better >> supported on the Beaglebone. >> > > They both use the same tools, or can. User space tools, apps, compilers, > etc. > > >> >> Both are good for blinking LEDs and simple embedded programming >> experiments. >> >> The rPI( at least mine ) only has one LED. > > > Dont treat this as an rPI endorsement however. I much prefer the > beaglebone in most cases, but the rPI, specifically the rPI's has many good > points too. > -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CALHSORpj6M3dxvSncVu1qLoiCRaN4ZL3-5gRO%3DR88YWviCLY8Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.