On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 17:22:43 -0600, Dan Muey wrote:
>> If it comes to the point where you need to "hack around" CGI.pm, I'd
>> say go with your original inclination to just do it yourself.

> Give me one example when you'd need to hack CGI.pm to handle input that
> you can't do without hacking it.

This might not justify as "hacking" the CGI.pm, but once I had to do
something really special related to session handling.  The solution wasn't
to hack, change or write my own CGI handling module, but simply subclass
the original CGI.pm.


-- 
Tore Aursand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to