Tore Aursand wrote: > On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 17:22:43 -0600, Dan Muey wrote: > >> If it comes to the point where you need to "hack around" CGI.pm, I'd > >> say go with your original inclination to just do it yourself. > > > Give me one example when you'd need to hack CGI.pm to handle input that > > you can't do without hacking it. > > This might not justify as "hacking" the CGI.pm, but once I had to do > something really special related to session handling. The solution wasn't > to hack, change or write my own CGI handling module, but simply subclass > the original CGI.pm.
Excellent idea. It's really the core of OOPs power. How is CGI for subclassing? Joseph -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
