On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 07:57 +0530, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> :) So let's wait for those with "real Bengali expertise" to speak up

SM's phrase 'real Bengali expertise' sounds suspicious. If some error
remains he can question it into unreality. 

Anyway, I am using Bangla for the for the last forty five years in
speech (not pretty exact about the time line) and around forty years in
writing (is the reality authentic?) and I went through the list. Not
only that I got no errors, but I actually liked the conjunct glyphs.
Some of them are redundant, in the sense that as Runa Bhattacharya once
pointed out here (or, maybe OOo BN list) that quite a few of them are
not actually used. They are, in that sense, theoretical constructs.
Though they may get necessary in some unknown instance of say, writing
in Bangla alphabet some outlandish scientific term. I think RB can be a
very good judge here: she studied the glyphs intensely consulting with
lots of dictionaries. 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Bengalinux-core mailing list
Bengalinux-core@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bengalinux-core

Reply via email to